Skip to main content

The History of Words

Before words, each person's thoughts could develop freely without the intervention of strangers’. If someone liked an other, a warm gesture would blossom. Fear would make them fight or flee. Or both. The idea of making love with words or of using them to express differences was something people could not even conceive.
Before words we were real individuals. People’s thoughts could be influenced by other people’s actions, but only as long as they were co-present. As soon as they went apart they were free from each other's influence. People could teach other people to do things but only by doing them. One could never ‘teach’ a task if one was unable to perform it.

Then some genius invented words. Molotov, his name, was the first word he created. It was a small ingenious device, bottle-shaped, that could encapsulate his idea of himself and explode inside other people’s thoughts. Excited with the first trials of the new invention, he started building new similar devices.
One day his assembly line produced the word word. He stopped. He pronounced the word in all tones and pitches. He drew it in different sizes and colours. And started thinking in the shape of the words he created. Every thought that didn’t fit in those devices was condemned to inexist.
His thinking, ever so knowledgeable about the ins and outs of word production since the construction of the word word, became attached to the productivity of his word factory. Everything he saw had to have a word.
He named things and they become distinguishable.
He made a word for other; then a name for each other.
When everyone else had names, he had to rename himself.
So he created the word God.

Naming changed the world and created new things. People started to ask: was there a world before words? So God mixed the herbs with the mushrooms, made room in the floor for the fire and put the kettle on. He had to invent words for things he had never seen or experienced.
He started to give names to what ceased to exist before words were invented. As he was doing it, he noticed that things came after the names, so words could create reality. He also notice that connections between words were being formed and that those connections changed the shape of words, thus changing even more the thoughts that they contained and the things they created.
He decided to get some help. Whatever he thought, as long as it could fill one of those Molotov cocktails, other people would think. Thinking machine working… scribe, slave, power. Thus he trained a team of word producers and started to build the story of all things and happenings hitherto.

God built a big loom in order to weave new connections between words. As he got more and more into textual production, he delegated much of the word production. He even gave his former name, Molotov to one of his slave scribes. One day, Molotov came by the loom where God was immersed. He was holding a word involved in a cloth between his hands. He stretched his arms inviting God to unveil it. They exchanged intrigued gazes before God slowly and nervously unclothe the package like he was undressing a virgin. Despite all care, a question mark fell on the floor. Then the vest joined it and the word Why was in God’s hands. It came from the same lot as Time, Molotov said, but God’s eyes didn’t seem to listen. The rest is history.

History is not a line. Nor a tree. It grows like ginger. Just like words. Even if you cut all the connections with the author, it continues to breed. History’s not a story; it’s a restless rhizome.
Before mobile phones there were pagers. Pagers were alright; as long as you were on the other end, where you could say whatever you wanted and feel like you were colonizing without the risk of being assimilated. However, just like any emperor might tell you, to maintain an empire it is essential to get some feed-back from your colonies. The catch is to make sure it is the right feed-back.
The genius who invented the text phones forgot to desinvent the centrifugal drive of communication.
Before electronic mails there were wired telegrams and before them there were posted letters and before letters there were graffiti. Walls like storytellers sitting at the crossroads with an anchor hearing and telling errant stories.
Some travellers decided to write books instead of telling stories or leaving them engraved on walls on the way. They wrote the story that the word inventor had told them and managed to colonize thoughts at long space-time distances.
The rest is history.

Popular posts from this blog

"Estamos em Seca!"

"Estamos em Seca", Cartaz da Thames Waters, Londres Abril de 2012 (foto de Delemere Lafferty ) Danças da Chuva: Austeridade e Abundância Para Todos (Maio, 2012) O que se passa com a água em Inglaterra ajuda-me a entender o que significa austeridade, a necessidade que temos dela e algumas das suas contradições.  Tal como nas economias europeias, a chuva continua a cair, mas não chega onde é preciso. Ao contrario das economias europeias, não existem sistemas financeiros com que se conta para regular a necessária redistribuição e racionalização de recursos. Por isso faz-se uso de campanhas e leis que são iguais para todos. Talvez este exemplo nos esteja a mostrar um caminho melhor. Abril de 2012 foi o Abril mais chuvoso de que há memória meteorológica em Inglaterra ou seja, desde 1910 . Em algumas regiões houve dias que mais do que duplicaram os anteriores recordes de pluviosidade. E mesmo assim, grande parte do país tem estado e continua a estar oficialmen...

The boy and the soldiers

Sitting on the riverbank I watch what floats by. The stream brings a child sitting on a hospital bed. He must be 12, about my son’s age. A bandage hangs from his left shoulder where his arm should be. He cries conpulsively, in a foreign language, so I can only imagine what he is saying. His wailing reminds me of phantom pain, and the tearful words seem to mourn the sudden amputation of his childhood, possibly performed without anaesthetic. But then I realise that his cries may refer to a deeper pain. Maybe the blast that took his arm also took his mum. Maybe all his family, as many in Gaza these days. Before this story enters into a loop, I flick it away with my thumb, making the stream move forward. Another image stops in front of me. Three young men on a desert road dance to Staying Alive by Bee Gees. Their faces look very familiar to me. But it’s not easy to see their faces. They are partially covered with helmets and their bodies are surrounded by military gear. They don’t sp...

Three steps for inverse hindsighting

Guess: What word was the most used by the Prime Minister, the police chiefs and the News Co heir in the parliamentary sessions about the phone hacking scandal? Without a proper count I would bet on 'hindsight'. At least I am sure that in the last couple of days I've heard it much more than it is usual. Cameron, the Sheriffs and the Murdochs, they all used it several times in the select committees and in the House of Commons. It is a good word and it has proved handy. I looked it up. It means “recognition of the realities, possibilities, or requirements of a situation, event, decision etc., after its occurrence”. Check. They’ve all deployed 'hindsight' according to its exact definition. But can one be a bit more daring? Like, I can give you some hindsight for the future.... Or: Now it is time to start thinking with future hindsight.... Mmm, it might not work. Maybe the best is to avoid the word altogether. So let’s try three easy steps for not having to use 'hi...